zone astrology aries

The lower the stakes now, the more straightforward January will be. in the second week of January will meet his/her justice, according to the astrology , in March . However, I have Panacea 21° in Sagittarius, Mars 22° in Taurus and Cupido 21° in Pisces. March 27, at am.

I think things run in cycles. This is one of those cycles where we are consolidating. The interest on the part of the general public…I think people who are interested are more serious than in the past — more considered. There is too much emphasis on technical studies and mythology and that sort of thing. Astrology has to combat the narrow minded scientific view that considers it superstition.

And at the same time they have to validate the science of astrology through a scientific process. I think that the foundations for the validation of our science will be found in the works of Carl Jung, who established an empirical basis for the unconscious, an empirical basis for psychology, and it is from the very solid groundwork that he put down that I think astrology will be scientifically validated. But that means that you have to use rigid scientific testing the way he did. You can take a hypothesis, as mystical as you like, or as mythological as you like — as long as you use a standard scientific approach and double blind studies, you can determine truth from it.

That is the road we have to look at very clearly. People that are more interested in the technique of astrology versus the psyche itself- developing astrology as a field for exploration of the unconscious. So I see us at a point…It is kind of like the left brain having to honor the right brain, and vice versa. We need to start coming together and incorporating not only left brain approaches to astrology, but right brain as well.

Using astrodrama experiential images…in other words, develop a full approach to astrology in the future, because it is something that is needed in our changing and intense environment. We are losing its life blood, losing its wetness or its juiciness. Instead of moving further and further out from the center, we should be trying to penetrate down into the chart. That not exactly legitimizes it within the higher educational department hierarchy, but I certainly do see among individuals a receptivity and an openness to it.

itlauto.com/wp-includes/use/3434-logiciel-de.php

The World of Astrology (A Criticism of the Astrological Milieu) by Sirman A. Celâyir

I must say that among astrologers, I feel that they are not open to studying psychotherapy. I think that is very justifiable, since astrologers have been ridiculed for so long that you had to be an especially Uranian kind of person to be willing to put up with the opprobrium that came with being an astrologer.

This is a small factor in the entire astrological principle. It seems to be running away with the entire field at this time. I think humanism has made its point and gone a little too far.

I think the way science is moving at the present time…Certain ideas that are coming out of the scientific community indicate that the mass mind is now looking at the true physical interaction of cycles in the world we live in. I think that there is a need to study strictly mundane reactions on a cyclical level. I think that we have the tools, particularly computers, to analyze large amounts of data.

I think that we are at the beginning of an era when we can find out what the underlying mechanism of astrology really is. This would have to involve some sort of credentials. I am not saying I dislike what is going on in astrology today. Eventually, if we are going to become a profession, we have to have the credentials and the educational background that would be accepted by the general public.

I think astrologers need to break out into the total wholistic community and break away from the incestual relationship they have with each other. They really need to let new thoughts and new ideas enter their community. Before they can become scientifically accepted, they need to accept the other metaphysical sciences. I think they have to start relating in those areas and in that way.

I think we need to become the wholism that we keep teaching. We need to accept that in our own community. This extends to the whole predominance of Sun signs in the area. In terms of professionalism among practitioners, we are all aware of how many laws there are in so many localities around the country that essentially associate astrology with gypsies, tramps and thieves.

The New Age of Astrology

A more cooperative kind of attitude. In a very real sense, in terms of the culture in which we find ourselves, we are pariahs. I have experienced this at the Astrological Association conferences in England where papers have to be printed before they are presented. The lectures then become more a presentation and a defense or a discussion of the ideas that are presented. This is more the way most professions work. None has emerged yet where professionals can interact with each other and not have to present a specific face to the public.

As far as my experiences at conferences in America, the primary reason I would go to a conference is to participate either on a panel or in the audience of the ACT Astrological Conference on Techniques seminars. I find that more there than anywhere else. I think the best thing they can do for themselves as astrologers and for astrology is to broaden their experience in other forms of learning. I think astrology is at a point in time where it really has to begin to get sophisticated about what its mode of thinking is. I think that astrology in the United States is not a leader in the acuity of measurement and the research of measurement.

Europe is ahead of us. But America is extremely well positioned in a global community now of sophisticated astrologers using computers, for research and case study testing, the likes of which have never been possible or conceivable before in history. I feel that we should take our enriched perspective of the human condition, fortify it within a framework of greater measurement sophistication, and test it and explore it as thoroughly and professionally as possible through our computer resources. In that way, we can be sure of our art and graceful with our science.

I have done that myself in other fields. But the rest of them are frequently selling it under the guise of psychology or counseling, or many other things that astrology may be a part of, but are not fundamentally astrology at all. The other end of the debate is the science vs. I think we have to keep working on and refining our theories, get more facts, and keep on working.

The whole end is on the rise, obviously. And the advent of personal home computers brings this within the reach of most astrologers.

Best Astrology Software - Top 10 List

Ten or fifteen years ago the level of expertise that was necessary, that one had to live up to before you would go out and lecture and begin to see clients, would be compared to Charles Jayne or Rudhyar or Marc Edmund Jones. A person had fifteen or twenty years of experience on them before they were out there calling themselves experts. Today, there seems to have been a tremendous popularization and almost anybody can go out there, with or without a background, and push their wares. The problem is that while astrologers in general voice their desire for research, they do not follow that up with any real support.

In the period of time that I have been active in professional astrology, which is nearly 36 years, I have only found eight persons who at least took the trouble to write me a letter to volunteer their services. Of those, only four people have actually done any work — I can now add a fifth this past year. We need qualified people to head the projects on research work. I do agree with some thoughts that Barry Lynes often has, in that I think that astrologers need to come out of the woodwork, come out of the personal dimension to an extent, and start applying their training to issues that are more life-threatening to the planet.

I am talking about ecology, and some of the things in that area. It would work if there was some quick resolution of it.


  • Features of LifeSign Mini Astrology Software!
  • capricorn daily love horoscope askganesha.
  • taurus horoscope december 14?
  • Subscribe to RSS!
  • aquarius december 9 compatibility.
  • aries weekly 24 to 1 tarot reading 2020.

But for a long time it seemed as if that was a kind of stalemate. Lots of thoughts come into my mind when you ask it. A big one comes through under commercialism; a lot of people are making money off astrology. Astrologers making money off the public.

8 of the Best Free Linux Astrology Software

In the sense that there are too many books being published which are not saying anything new. In my own field, research, it is terribly exciting. Some bloke has just got a file of 47, birth dates which I can analyze two, three, four ways, as it were, after dinner. The computer is an enormous aid. That has to improve a level of astrology.

I feel that to heal the planet, and for astrology to heal itself, involves a reintegration of the sacred and the scientific.

So that we are not necessarily leading the ride, but we are along on it. So we are part of the cultural problem of integrating the technological and the sacred. I think one way in which astrology particularly can contribute to the reintegration of the sacred and the technological is to return to our roots, which really integrated both of these elements. We have to go pre-Greek, when astrology was not about defining individuals as unique and separate beings, but as reminding individuals that they were part of a community and part of a collective process. In a sense, astrology, as one of the original sciences, became overly crystallized and separated.

We frighten them, because our past is their future. That just as we became overly specialized, crystallized, and dropped out of the mainstream, so will every individual science. I feel very positive about it. My involvement is small, but I have the feeling that as a group and as a community, we are maturing, becoming more tolerant of different points of view. We still have a lot on the personality level to work out, to be able to deal with one another more respectfully, and less on a personality level, but I think we are moving in that direction.

I think things run in cycles. This is one of those cycles where we are consolidating. The interest on the part of the general public…I think people who are interested are more serious than in the past — more considered. There is too much emphasis on technical studies and mythology and that sort of thing. Astrology has to combat the narrow minded scientific view that considers it superstition.

And at the same time they have to validate the science of astrology through a scientific process. I think that the foundations for the validation of our science will be found in the works of Carl Jung, who established an empirical basis for the unconscious, an empirical basis for psychology, and it is from the very solid groundwork that he put down that I think astrology will be scientifically validated.

But that means that you have to use rigid scientific testing the way he did. You can take a hypothesis, as mystical as you like, or as mythological as you like — as long as you use a standard scientific approach and double blind studies, you can determine truth from it. That is the road we have to look at very clearly. People that are more interested in the technique of astrology versus the psyche itself- developing astrology as a field for exploration of the unconscious.

Most Popular

So I see us at a point…It is kind of like the left brain having to honor the right brain, and vice versa. We need to start coming together and incorporating not only left brain approaches to astrology, but right brain as well. Using astrodrama experiential images…in other words, develop a full approach to astrology in the future, because it is something that is needed in our changing and intense environment.

We are losing its life blood, losing its wetness or its juiciness. Instead of moving further and further out from the center, we should be trying to penetrate down into the chart.